1
DNB Cardiology, Fellow of Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, Department
of cardiology, SDM Narayana Heart Centre, Dharwad, India
2
Department of Cardiology, SDM Narayana Heart Centre, Dharwad, India
Corresponding author details:
Sagar Mali
Department of Cardiology
SDM Narayana Heart Centre
Dharwad,India
Copyright:
© 2020 Sagar M. This is
an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 international License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
Patient suffering from undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) presents with
a few features characteristic of known connective tissue diseases but laboratory test results
of antinuclear antibodies do not support clinical picture to establish a definitive diagnosis.
It could be due to genetic predisposition though precise mechanism of pathogenesis
involved in UCTD remains unknown. It is thought to be due to faulty immune system that
reacts and targets the tissues of one’s own body. We discuss a case of young individual with
breathlessness and palpitation, who upon evaluation found to have massive hemorrhagic
pericardial effusion (PE) secondary to early UCTD. Patient underwent emergency
pericardiocentesis and recovered following steroid and csDMARD therapy. This case report
shows that massive hemorrhagic PE could be the only presenting finding in a case of early
UCTD and suggests that early, accurate diagnosis can lead to successful recovery without
morbidity.
Undifferentiated connective tissue disorder; Massive hemorrhagic pericardial effusion;
Pericardiocentesis; Dr. Leroy
A varied presentation can be seen in a patient visiting to clinic with undifferentiated
connective tissue disease (UCTD). Some of which are fatigue, Raynaud’s phenomenon,
arthralgia/arthritis, sicca syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, malar rash, vasculitis, muscle
weakness, oral/nasal lesions, photosensitivity, cytopenia and alopecia [1-3]. The previous
studies also found evidence of major end organ damage (i.e kidneys, lungs and heart). The
prevalence of cardiac involvement in UCTD ranges from 13 to 65%[1].A case of massive
hemorrhagic pericardial effusion as initial manifestation in early UCTD has been seldom
reported.
Case report
A 26 years old male presented to cardiac OPD with complaints of breathlessness, palpitations, generalized weakness, easy fatigability, abdominal discomfort, loss of appetite, dry cough, chest pain (on & off) and fever (on & off) of 8 days duration. No history of joint pain, Raynaud’s phenomenon, trauma to chest or bleeding diathesis noted. On admission, ECG revealed atrial tachycardia with Right bundle branch block (Figure 1). Patient’s Echocardiography revealed large ostium secundum atrial septal defect(OS ASD) measuring 32mm with left to right shunt, grossly dilated right atrium (RA)/ right ventricle (RV)/ pulmonary artery (PA), moderate pulmonary artery hypertension(PAH), ejection fraction 35% without RA/RV collapse and massive pericardial effusion & no evidence of cardiac tamponade. Patient’s blood report for hepatitis B, C and HIV were negative. Cardiac markers were negative. Total leukocyte count was 9300 cells/L. Chest X-ray on admission showed marked enlargement of cardiac outline (water bottle sign) (Figure 2).
Pericardiocentesis was done under echocardiographic guidance and a total of 800ml of hemorrhagic fluid aspirated. The fluid was sent for biochemical analysis, culture/sensitivity and fluid cytology. In view of hemorrhagic nature of fluid MDCT chest was performed to rule out mediastinal malignancy and tuberculosis. Post-pericardiocentesis MDCT chest showed moderate pericardial effusion with pulmonary hypertension, patchy consolidation & CT bronchogram in bilateral basal lung fields (L>R); few enlarged pre-paratracheal & prevascular lymph nodes (Figure 3). Biochemical analysis of pericardial fluid showed in (Table 1). Pericardial fluid cytology showed in (Table 2). Since fluid cytology showed lymphocyte predominance, fluid was also sent for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M TB) culture and Gene Xpert MTB/RTF test. Results for fluid microscopy and AFB were negative. The fluid culture yielded no growth of bacteria or fungi after 48 hours of incubation. Gene Xpert MTB/RTF, a semi-nested real time PCR was negative for tuberculosis. M TB culture on LJ media yielded no growth after 8 weeks of incubation. Patient was managed with low dose diuretics and antibiotics during hospital stay. To rule out connective tissue diseases, anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) analysis were performed which was positive for antibodies against PCNA and Ribosomal-P-protein. Patient was diagnosed of early UCTD and started on conventional synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARD)
Patient underwent pericardial fluid aspiration subsequently
on 4 occasions (150ml, 180ml, 230ml & 45ml respectively) during
hospital stay on alternate days, showing decrease in effusion and fall
in CRP after csDMARD therapy. Patient had trace pericardial effusion
at the time of discharge (Figure 4).
Figure 1: ECG on admission showing atrial tachycardia with
right bundle branch block
Figure 2: Chest X-ray (on admission) showing enlarge cardiac
outline giving water bottle sign, second image of chest X-ray
(after 4 days) showing improvement in cardiac outline.
Figure 3: Post-pericardiocentesis CT chest- Axial section (with
contrast) and coronal section showing moderate pericardial
effusion.
Figure 4: Echocardiographic image at the time of discharge
showing large ASD & trace pericardial effusion.
Table 1: Biochemical analysis of pericardial fluid
Table 2: Pericardial fluid cytology
Connective tissue disease (CTD) is complex in nature and relatively rare. Though, CTDs namely systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), scleroderma, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and Sjogren’s syndrome have criteria for classification, some cases do not meet these criteria & often diagnosed as UCTD [4]. It was Dr. Leroy, a rheumatologist at Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, who first proposed this concept in 1980. Based on his findings, UCTD cases may remain undifferentiated indefinitely or they may all eventually develop into a defined CTD or go into complete remission [5].
Today, UCTD has been accepted as distinct clinical entity. Mosca M, et al. [6] has proposed preliminary classification criteria for UCTD
I.Signs and symptoms suggestive of a connective tissue disease, but not fulfilling the criteria for any of the defined CTDs for at least three years.
II. Presence of antinuclear antibodies determined on two different occasions [6].
Recently, UCTD is further divided into ‘stable UCTD’ cases and ‘early UCTD’ cases which show recent onset of symptoms (< 3 years) and unclear clinical picture. The stable UCTD cases are clinically stable over time requiring only mild therapeutic intervention, whereas early UCTD cases are likely to develop into definite CTD over a period of time requiring disease monitoring and treatment decision making [7]. In our case, the patient had massive pericardial effusion of hemorrhagic nature, but had neither reduction of left ventricular internal dimension nor pulsus paradoxus to indicate cardiac tamponade. The development of cardiac tamponade was delayed due to equilibrium of flow across the ASD and patient was saved from the fatal consequences of cardiac tamponade.
Patient’s positive ANA analysis and raised CRP suggested an
active autoimmune connective tissue disease. Since the patient did
not meet the available classification criteria for any connective tissue
disease, and also the disease duration was less than 3 years, patient
was diagnosed as having early UCTD. Patient’s total leukocyte count
was normal and culture yielded no growth of any bacteria or fungi
which ruled out infective cause. No history of trauma to chest and
bleeding tendencies indicated some other cause responsible for
hemorrhagic nature of pericardial effusion. Tubercular etiology was
excluded because of no growth on LJ media and negative Gene Xpert
MTB/RTF (semi-nested real time PCR) report & for malignancy no
evidence of atypical cells noted in pericardial fluid. MDCT chest ruled
out malignancy as well as tuberculosis. After all common causes of
hemorrhagic pericardial effusion were excluded, case was worked
up for connective tissue disease, which revealed raised CRP and
positive ANA analysis (positive for PCNA & ribosomal p protein
antibodies). Patient was diagnosed of early UCTD and initiated on
steroid+csDMARD therapy which reduced CRP value as well as made
patient effusion free within a short duration of hospital stay. This case
presents early UCTD as rare cause of massive hemorrhagic pericardial
effusion and to the best of our knowledge, the case we described
here is the first case report of massive hemorrhagic pericardial
effusion as onset manifestation in a patient with early UCTD. Cardiac
involvement is relatively common in established connective tissue
diseases (CTDs) especially in scleroderma and systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE) patients but it is rare in early UCTD. Pericardial
effusion of moderate to severe grade is usually caused by end stage
renal disease, myocardial infarction, malignancy, iatrogenic or
idiopathic; idiopathic cause being the most common cause [8]. The
presentation in our case is peculiar as well as rare because patient
had massive pericardial effusion of hemorrhagic nature without any
features of CTD. Therefore, in differential diagnosis of any pericardial
effusion UCTD should be considered as possible cause and should be
evaluated to rule it out. These cases respond to steroids and DMARD
therapy very well without recurrence of effusion.
All hemorrhagic pericardial effusion cases require exclusion of all causes carefully.
Early UCTD can present as causative etiology for massive hemorrhagic pericardial effusion.
Periodic follow up of patients with early UCTD is must, because they
are at risk of developing known connective tissue diseases within 5
years of disease onset.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to
influence the work reported in this paper.
I would like to thank Dr Vivekanand Gajapati, Head of Cardiology
Department, for his expert advice and encouragement. I would also
like to thank Dr. Kirti L for her support.
Copyright © 2020 Boffin Access Limited.